If you were in charge of a Relic developer team....
13 Feb 2015, 19:55 PM
#1
Posts: 1595 | Subs: 2
The responses should be very interesting. I suspect there will be a complete split in responses. I was wrong.
The views and opinions expressed in my posts and topics are solely those of the Napalm. These views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of Relic, the developers, The Angry Bears and/or any/all contributors to this site.
13 Feb 2015, 19:58 PM
#2
Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1
None of the above. The game is perfect as it is. I have aspergers syndrome so for me it is very nice that I know what is going to happen each 1v1 game I play.
13 Feb 2015, 20:00 PM
#3
Posts: 670
I wouldn't include faction design in core functionality, but - nevertheless - balance and bugs are surely the most important things in my humble opinion (and I think not only mine).
I myself bought 14 OKW factions during a Steam sale last year for alt accounts
13 Feb 2015, 20:01 PM
#4
Posts: 449
I would have split bug fixes and balance.
Still a good poll but I suspect we'll see a very clear trend.
Still a good poll but I suspect we'll see a very clear trend.
13 Feb 2015, 20:01 PM
#5
Posts: 1595 | Subs: 2
The truth will be in the numbers. Vote community, vote hard.
The views and opinions expressed in my posts and topics are solely those of the Napalm. These views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of Relic, the developers, The Angry Bears and/or any/all contributors to this site.
13 Feb 2015, 20:02 PM
#6
Posts: 17
There are still a lot of bugs in this game and a plethora of useless units and Soviet / Wehrmacht commanders that require adjusting.
Once that is done give us new maps, doctrines, factions, etc.
Once that is done give us new maps, doctrines, factions, etc.
13 Feb 2015, 20:02 PM
#7
8 Posts: 2470
if i had two votes i would put core functionality right after balance/bugs
13 Feb 2015, 20:05 PM
#8
Posts: 1595 | Subs: 2
Mods could we get a sticky on this post for a week?
The views and opinions expressed in my posts and topics are solely those of the Napalm. These views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of Relic, the developers, The Angry Bears and/or any/all contributors to this site.
13 Feb 2015, 20:07 PM
#9
8 Posts: 2470
if Action Items: Balance Feedback Required get's bumped i would support that. that thread is like 6 months out of relevance.
13 Feb 2015, 20:12 PM
#10
10 Posts: 4785 | Subs: 3
First priority would be balance and after that I would try to break the SEGA chains a bit more to communicate with the community!
13 Feb 2015, 20:13 PM
#11
Posts: 438
Revisiting existing content and making adjustments (example: unit balancing, map balance, bug fixes)
Changing core functionality of the game (example: faction design, OBS, game modes)
I find that both of these choices are much more complex and tied together. You can fix bugs but without core changes in functionality revisiting existing content would be a weekly thing.....just my thoughts as a programmer.
Changing core functionality of the game (example: faction design, OBS, game modes)
I find that both of these choices are much more complex and tied together. You can fix bugs but without core changes in functionality revisiting existing content would be a weekly thing.....just my thoughts as a programmer.
13 Feb 2015, 20:14 PM
#12
Posts: 1484
I would say in COH2 both revisiting balance and revising core design.
 | Playercard of WingZero | |||||||||||||||
|
13 Feb 2015, 20:16 PM
#13
1 Posts: 1021 | Subs: 1
imo there are quite a lot of core design issues, not only faction design and obs, but also side armor, there are many problems with the engine, etc.
i would rather begin the development of coh3 instead of sorting this mess out.
i would rather begin the development of coh3 instead of sorting this mess out.
“Ha! They're scratching your paint job, Helmut!”
13 Feb 2015, 20:17 PM
#14
Posts: 2070
i voted revisiting existing content, but i feel that bug fixes should be split
Axis doesn't have the best AT options in the game
13 Feb 2015, 20:18 PM
#15
Posts: 680
First priority would be balance and after that I would try to break the SEGA chains a bit more to communicate with the community!
This.
13 Feb 2015, 20:21 PM
#16
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
None of the above. The game is perfect as it is. I have aspergers syndrome so for me it is very nice that I know what is going to happen each 1v1 game I play.
As an individual with an actual diagnosis for that, let me assure you even they would fail to.
13 Feb 2015, 20:22 PM
#17
Posts: 1595 | Subs: 2
The developers have nothing to do with communication. Focus! rawr!
The views and opinions expressed in my posts and topics are solely those of the Napalm. These views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of Relic, the developers, The Angry Bears and/or any/all contributors to this site.
13 Feb 2015, 20:24 PM
#18
Posts: 106
The responses should be very interesting. I suspect there will be a complete split in responses.
You do?
There's one gigantically clear message that the majority of players here have been voicing, and that message happens to have 74% of the 27 votes.
I didn't think it would be any sort of surprise what the responses would be.
Balance units and maps, fix bugs, adjust old commanders, and release new commanders.
And communicate.
Happy community.
13 Feb 2015, 20:28 PM
#19
15 
Posts: 1708 | Subs: 2
The core game needs more improvements as that's what keeps people playing. The core game is definitely better now than at launch but it does need more work.
13 Feb 2015, 20:30 PM
#20
Posts: 438
Balance units and maps, fix bugs, adjust old commanders, and release new commanders.
You do relize that this will fix nothing correct? It would only create new issues. You can nerf Obers to the ground but there would still be issues with OKW....The game itself needs a core overhaul and a redesign of its Faction/Gamemode functionality. ALso adding new commanders and adjusting old would mean nothing but more units/abilities that would need to be taken into account when fixing the core of the game...
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
55 | ||
 |
|
|
41 | ||
|
|
|
|
16 | ||
 |
|
|
14 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
141 | ||
|
|
|
|
8 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.968562.633+23
- 2.555227.710+11
- 3.29446.865-1
- 4.276110.715+14
- 5.259143.644+3
- 6.250150.625+11
- 7.22491.711+11
- 8.250135.649+1
- 9.19265.747+5
- 10.6111.847+8
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
7
Download
750
Board Info
468 users are online:
468 guests
9 posts in the last 24h
37 posts in the last week
152 posts in the last month
37 posts in the last week
152 posts in the last month
Registered members: 45058
Welcome our newest member, podcasts
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, podcasts
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM