Ummm, some poor ranked 38,000 guy who has problem killing panther will put the blame on everything but himself and his lack of skills. Ever wondered why absolutely terrible players happen to be most vocal ones, flaming everything and anything but themselves?
On official forums some german nublet complained how OP and uncounterable SU-76 is and you are trying to make it sound like he have a valid concern, just because he plays worse then easy AI.
Being bad is not a balance argument and when paid commanders are as strong as free ones, then its not P2W, its just QQ of the ones who don't want to pay. Relic went full retard with elite troops more then anything else in game, but this is going to be balanced now, so will you still call it P2W?
So, I could say "You have to sometimes look through other peoples perspective not just your own opinion and experience".
But you cannot say anything that will change this:
DLC commander comes out - DLC commander gets heavy nerf - DLC commander gets another nerf. After its been tested out by Devs and on balance servers.
Just because you can beat someone with DLC commander it doesn't mean its not P2W
There is nothing to say. Proof is in the nerfs.
I have nothing against DLC personally, as long as they don't break game balance every month or so.