You didn’t answer my question. Can we include the Maus because COH has taken liberties before? You’re basically arguing none of it matters anyway, so we might as well add an M1 Abrams too. Maybe the US can get an atomic bomb ability too. At what point do YOU draw a line?
I didnt answer it because been asked a dozen times already. If maus were balanced i wouldnt care. This isnt about axis v allies and im really bored of ppl trying to turn the conversation into that
But stop it with that m1 abrams crap. Dont act like me saying im accepting a prototype from 1945 is the same as being okay with a tank that saw its first action in 1980. THats just a ridiculous exaggeration
At least maus and BP were actually designed by ww2 engineers. ANd were being built during the war
You can make the argument that the Black Prince isn’t more of a liberty to take than the Pershing but saying anything goes because liberties were taken before doesn’t make sense.
THen its a good thing i didnt say anything goes. I just dont think the gap between BP inclusion and Relics already taken liberties is as large as u do
Its not just about timeline, unit frequency matters just as much imo. COh2s meta has had things like Sturmtiger and Jagdtiger be units that were seen in almost every match. That is not at all reasonable by history standards either, but its a video game so i dont mind that violation. ITs effect on gameplay variety bothers me more than the insult to historians
If BP shows its face every game then i will have problems with that. But thats more for gameplay reasons, i think uber units in general make the gameplay more stale