Login

russian armor

Stuart is the worst armored unit in the game, by far.

29 May 2022, 13:40 PM
#1
avatar of TheDonOfGhaz

Posts: 22

Costing 125 fuel to field, it is a truly awful unit.

Slow, inaccurate, weak weaponry, and expensive compared to other units in its class.

Discuss.
29 May 2022, 14:02 PM
#2
avatar of DonnieChan

Posts: 2184 | Subs: 1

29 May 2022, 14:04 PM
#3
avatar of TheDonOfGhaz

Posts: 22

the 250 open top halftrack has armor too, you know XD


Yes, but it's good at what it does, and it's cheap.
29 May 2022, 14:15 PM
#4
avatar of BetterDead ThanRed

Posts: 216

for what it does, i feel its too expensive, with no particular role.
isn't it 70 fuel? if so make it 55-60 fuel
29 May 2022, 14:16 PM
#5
avatar of Katukov

Posts: 702 | Subs: 1

for some reason it has absolute dogshit anti infantry damage at a range, unless you are like 10 range and stationary at an exposed squad


apparently it has good AT but it really doesn't excel in that regard either
29 May 2022, 17:10 PM
#6
avatar of Protos Angelus

Posts: 1460

Stuart is in a good spot. If anything should be changed, it would be the fuel price. It's more suited to cost 55-60 fuel.
29 May 2022, 19:57 PM
#7
avatar of Kurobane

Posts: 637

Stuart is in a good spot. If anything should be changed, it would be the fuel price. It's more suited to cost 55-60 fuel.


Even if it was 30 fuel it still wouldn't be worth it because the Stuart is hot garbage. Hands down the worst unit in the game next to Partisans.

The Stuart is basically a 70 fuel armored version of Rear Echelon Troops that does 0 damage and offers zero utility. M20 is like a King Tiger in Comparison to the Stuart. It is just that much better than the Stuart.
29 May 2022, 20:17 PM
#8
avatar of Protos Angelus

Posts: 1460



Even if it was 30 fuel it still wouldn't be worth it because the Stuart is hot garbage. Hands down the worst unit in the game next to Partisans.

The Stuart is basically a 70 fuel armored version of Rear Echelon Troops that does 0 damage and offers zero utility. M20 is like a King Tiger in Comparison to the Stuart. It is just that much better than the Stuart.


In teamgames mostly. But in 1v1s it does do it's job decently. AT is ok. Abilities are decent. AI is nothing to write home about, but is consistent. Veterancy on it is great, gaining vision.

Wouldn't really call it hot garbage. It's not as specialized as luchs, T70, flak HT, or AAHT, but it's more generalized like the AEC. Stuart and AEC are more 1v1 (maybe 2v2) unit, where there aren't a sh*tload of infantry
30 May 2022, 03:49 AM
#9
avatar of Jilet

Posts: 556

M8 being stock. I have a dream.
30 May 2022, 04:22 AM
#10
avatar of Kurobane

Posts: 637

jump backJump back to quoted post30 May 2022, 03:49 AMJilet
M8 being stock. I have a dream.


I would rather see the Stuart swapped with the M8 which is significantly more useful than a Stuart could ever hope to be.
30 May 2022, 07:11 AM
#11
avatar of theekvn

Posts: 266

I would delete stupid non sense "Engine critical" abilitya and give Stuart little price buff.
30 May 2022, 07:26 AM
#12
avatar of Esxile

Posts: 3465 | Subs: 1

Too RNG, even at shooting sandbags which become their primary target after 5 minutes in the game.
30 May 2022, 09:50 AM
#13
avatar of DonnieChan

Posts: 2184 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post30 May 2022, 07:26 AMEsxile
Too RNG, even at shooting sandbags which become their primary target after 5 minutes in the game.

ahahhahah post of the week :)

seriously we need a hall of fame thread with the bost forum posts
1 Jun 2022, 09:59 AM
#14
avatar of BasedSecretary

Posts: 1056

too expensive, make cheaper!
1 Jun 2022, 11:58 AM
#15
avatar of FelixTHM

Posts: 503 | Subs: 1



I would rather see the Stuart swapped with the M8 which is significantly more useful than a Stuart could ever hope to be.


Erm, no. Without Stuart in LT tier Luchs/Flak HT/222/Flame HT would become insanely oppressive. I don't want to have to tech racks super early and then get zooks instead of BARs.
1 Jun 2022, 12:35 PM
#16
avatar of BasedSecretary

Posts: 1056



Erm, no. Without Stuart in LT tier Luchs/Flak HT/222/Flame HT would become insanely oppressive. I don't want to have to tech racks super early and then get zooks instead of BARs.


FlakHT, 222 and FlameHT can all be dealt with using a snare and a couple of lucky shots. Luchs is more oppressive sure,.
1 Jun 2022, 12:40 PM
#17
avatar of Protos Angelus

Posts: 1460



FlakHT, 222 and FlameHT can all be dealt with using a snare and a couple of lucky shots. Luchs is more oppressive sure,.


You serious? This is next level low IQ play here.
1 Jun 2022, 16:01 PM
#19
avatar of BetterDead ThanRed

Posts: 216

sounds alot better to swap m8 with stuart, stuart is ''fine'' (except a lot of things) but most go for m4 anyway, 70 fuel for a stopgap is too much.

haven't played m8 in a long time, how is the stats and price compared to the stuart?

1 Jun 2022, 23:34 PM
#20
avatar of Willy Pete

Posts: 174

Dont think its worth 70 fuel. Maybe 50ish

Could be useful in 1v1 but its a def a waste in team games
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • Oberkommando West flag Oziligath
  • The British Forces flag T.R. Sidewinder
uploaded by Oziligath

Board Info

221 users are online: 2 members and 219 guests
serg_codmod, Katukov
13 posts in the last 24h
134 posts in the last week
796 posts in the last month
Registered members: 34888
Welcome our newest member, Mcqueeney
Most online: 1221 users on 25 Feb 2020, 12:03 PM