Login

russian armor

General Power of Factions in 1v1

18 Jul 2020, 16:56 PM
#41
avatar of IncendiaryRounds:)

Posts: 1527

Permanently Banned
jump backJump back to quoted post18 Jul 2020, 16:54 PMKatitof

Thank you for providing hard evidence of being not only delusional, but also clueless.
Why are you talking about this issue again? You are as qualified on it as I am on on teaching CN how to play the game.

I agree with that, but I also think you should put the shovel down now.


"Hard evidence" of being delusional and clueless. Seems you don't know the definition of hard evidence.
18 Jul 2020, 17:34 PM
#44
avatar of Mr Carmine

Posts: 1227



I was always here. I don't post willy nilly. My unofficial job is to keep the forums at a respectable IQ level for all members.


Demanding exposure of people voting ukf to be something you dont agree with is quite willy nilly. Its a subjective matter when people give opnions.
Its also something certain fascist groups do.

And as for keeping the forum iq level respectable... well you need to up your game then. You overestimate your contribution here.
Screaming demands to the sky and refusing to accept other outcomes then what you believe to be true only brings the iq level down.

18 Jul 2020, 18:53 PM
#47
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279



I'd be flattered if you actually took the time for an in-depth performance review.

But who reviews the reviewer?
18 Jul 2020, 19:08 PM
#48
avatar of KiwiBirb

Posts: 789

This poll isn’t contributing to balancing this game?

Polls are just opinions, which are not a good balance tool. If we want to know the power of each faction, we can just look at their win/loss ratios
19 Jul 2020, 09:15 AM
#49
avatar of A table

Posts: 249

My unofficial job is to keep the forums at a respectable IQ level for all members.


Ironic. The only thing you've proven yourselfs to be capable of in this forum is screaming the mantra of a̴͎̫͑x̸̬͋ï̴̼̥̋s̴̗̜̃ ̵̛͙̬͠u̵͍̎ń̵͕̑ď̵͈̍e̶̢̝͑͛r̴͎̒p̶̫̞̆̆o̸̻͐w̴͕̯͑̓ẻ̶͍̞͋ŗ̸̻͝e̵͍͆̋ḑ̴̎́ and assuming that everyone who disagrees is biased to high hell.
19 Jul 2020, 14:36 PM
#51
avatar of Clarity

Posts: 478

jump backJump back to quoted post19 Jul 2020, 14:35 PMClarity


Could a mod remove my previous post, I meant to edit a mistake in my original.
20 Jul 2020, 13:52 PM
#54
avatar of Sp33dSnake

Posts: 149

Honestly in 1v1 I can still hold my own with VSL's, and even throw in Mechanized in my rotation. Mechanized is pretty good for what it is. So is Jaeger Infantry.

But my best commander is Ostruppen, despite that I hate the railway artillery strike because of its limited use as an area denial weapon only. Any competent player will hear it coming a mile away. I mainly use it for protecting their cutoff I capped to hurt them in the resource war.

I have a dream the railway strike will be replaced with a call in Flammenpanzer 38, but that would make the doctrine so ridiculously OP the change would last all of 2 seconds.

But its saying something that the most successful doctrines are about using a different mainline infantry altogether, giving mainline units an extra guy with a G43, or using ass grens and not using stock grens at all and waiting for PG's.

The only thing Grens can take on stock are Conscripts, and 7 man Conscripts or SVT Conscripts will eat a 4 man LMG 42 alive. And they both cost 240. And grens need a building built.

Listen, I know its unpopular opinion to talk about buffing grens, and that they have the best support weapons in the game (debatable, particularly with AT guns and mortars), but people are using those doctrines because stock grens suck as is.
20 Jul 2020, 15:25 PM
#55
avatar of KONIUX27

Posts: 136

this poll makes not much sense since matchup is important
24 Jul 2020, 22:20 PM
#57
avatar of ZeroZeroNi

Posts: 1563

jump backJump back to quoted post15 Jul 2020, 20:02 PMKatitof
Pools like this never work.

It always turns to "which faction you main?" -weakest faction, always.
And "which faction you don't like to fight against most" -strongest faction, always.

I main Sovs and I picked them as being 2nd strongest (Though I'm a shit player and my perception of the game is obscured somewhat by my skill level).
20 Aug 2020, 10:28 AM
#58
avatar of Lady Xenarra

Posts: 868

Abstained as I do not play 1v1. The weakest faction results are....unsurprising to say the least lol. My interpretation of OKW in general is that it has a tiny slither of power spike at the start and then another one in the endgame where the T4 vehicles + obers start doing real work. Obviously this fares poorly in a setting where the endgame is rarely got to for long, if at all!

Mech + BGruup provide their own power spikes but come with major disadvantages (healing + ISG/flak AA OR proper light vehicles + stuka) and neither address your soon to be rapidly devaluing infantry.
21 Aug 2020, 06:06 AM
#59
avatar of ullumulu

Posts: 2241

There is a reason why most tournaments was won by allie factions the last times

and its not because the player was better with them. it was because allie faction are easier to play and with brits in team games they are hilarious.
their emplacements and IS spam is....you could see it in the tournaments...too much.
aaa
21 Aug 2020, 07:57 AM
#60
avatar of aaa

Posts: 1484

80% of voters are 300+ or trash from team games. Thats why okw is bad for them. Since its most noob frendly faction. Any faction would be bad in thier hands. Okw is not weak at all. I would rather nerf certain things like obers and panters
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • Oberkommando West flag Oziligath
  • The British Forces flag T.R. Sidewinder
uploaded by Oziligath

Board Info

240 users are online: 2 members and 238 guests
Onimusha, Crecer13
53 posts in the last 24h
227 posts in the last week
842 posts in the last month
Registered members: 33228
Welcome our newest member, Ardiontrkis
Most online: 1221 users on 25 Feb 2020, 12:03 PM