Login

russian armor

Jackson Nerf vs Making Panther Doctrinal

PAGES (10)down
8 Nov 2019, 14:51 PM
#181
avatar of achpawel

Posts: 1351

Why do people find it so hard to fight Jacksons when Paks and Shreks get the job done? Jackson has 0 anti infantry capability.


True. The problem is that USF has many tools to make paks useless. They are too slow to react to flanks and of course terrible attacking kiting units. Their range is 60 (just like TDs) and tank destroyers shooting at advancing tanks will almost always be out of their range and screened by infantry. Shrecks are very expensive upgrade on a fragile and expensive squad. Screening infantry has a relatively easy job of damaging them forcing a retreat or simply wiping them when they want to have that one more volley.
8 Nov 2019, 18:46 PM
#182
avatar of WingZero

Posts: 1484



True. The problem is that USF has many tools to make paks useless. They are too slow to react to flanks and of course terrible attacking kiting units. Their range is 60 (just like TDs) and tank destroyers shooting at advancing tanks will almost always be out of their range and screened by infantry. Shrecks are very expensive upgrade on a fragile and expensive squad. Screening infantry has a relatively easy job of damaging them forcing a retreat or simply wiping them when they want to have that one more volley.


To be honest AT guns are great vs USF since they have no Kat and yes Gal but that is doctrinal. You just have to micro and defend you AT guns and Shrek squads.
8 Nov 2019, 18:52 PM
#183
avatar of achpawel

Posts: 1351



To be honest AT guns are great vs USF since they have no Kat and yes Gal but that is doctrinal. You just have to micro and defend you AT guns and Shrek squads.


Agreed. The problem is not with defending, which you can do successfully. Offensive capabilities are inferior. You just have to close in more and it is difficult to chase a kiting 60 range TD with a Pak or panzergrens. You have pack howie as USF instead of werfer.
11 Nov 2019, 09:23 AM
#184
avatar of ullumulu

Posts: 2243



To be honest AT guns are great vs USF since they have no Kat and yes Gal but that is doctrinal. You just have to micro and defend you AT guns and Shrek squads.


who need kat or something to counter easily AT wall as USF?

you only need pak howie, scotts or one of the dozen callin arty from USF. play smart...not hard
11 Nov 2019, 09:58 AM
#185
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17875 | Subs: 8



who need kat or something to counter easily AT wall as USF?

you only need pak howie, scotts or one of the dozen callin arty from USF. play smart...not hard


Oh, oh can I try as well?

*clears throat*

who need panther or something to counter easily TD walls as ost?

you only need PaK, shreck or one of the docs with ele or SCAS. play smart... not hard


Did I do well?
11 Nov 2019, 10:05 AM
#186
avatar of ullumulu

Posts: 2243

jump backJump back to quoted post11 Nov 2019, 09:58 AMKatitof


Oh, oh can I try as well?

*clears throat*

who need panther or something to counter easily TD walls as ost?

you only need PaK, shreck or one of the docs with ele or SCAS. play smart... not hard


Did I do well?


U never will change your trolling style, right?

You should really learn to read the context. Paks, schrecks and ele or jgtoiger will do nothing against pak howies and scotts when you know that they have more range and/ or is teamweapon. So the USF scotts and paks can counter easily axis pak wall.
PAGES (10)down
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Livestreams

Offline

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

467 users are online: 1 member and 466 guests
Muad'Dib
4 posts in the last 24h
32 posts in the last week
85 posts in the last month
Registered members: 44630
Welcome our newest member, kajalfw8
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM