WBP 1.3 Penals flamers
by
Finndeed
6th January 2017, 12:45 PM
- [00:00:03] RtN.Hector:
- [00:00:06] wmm//Finndeed:
- [00:00:29] RtN.Hector:
- [00:00:41] wmm//Finndeed:
- [00:00:47] wmm//Finndeed:
- [00:00:48] RtN.Hector:
- [00:00:49] RtN.Hector:
- [00:00:56] RtN.Hector:
- [00:00:59] wmm//Finndeed:
- [00:01:00] RtN.Hector:
- [00:01:07] RtN.Hector:
- [00:01:17] RtN.Hector:
- [00:01:35] RtN.Hector:
- [00:01:39] wmm//Finndeed:
- [00:01:49] RtN.Hector:
- [00:03:15] RtN.Hector:
- [00:14:13] RtN.Hector:
- [00:14:22] wmm//Finndeed:
- [00:14:28] wmm//Finndeed:
- [00:14:33] RtN.Hector:
- [00:19:54] RtN.Hector:
6 Jan 2017, 12:45 PM
#1


Posts: 612 | Subs: 1
I had to work REALLY hard to beat this, I still think penal flamers are a bad idea from the perspective of fun and balance and design.
6 Jan 2017, 13:45 PM
#2

Posts: 1225
Penals and flamers are the dumbest idea since rifles with flamers. Give durable, already high dps inf a flamer, cover becomes meaningless, infantry engagements become a farce.
6 Jan 2017, 14:13 PM
#3


Posts: 612 | Subs: 1
You been playing 1.3 as well?
6 Jan 2017, 14:36 PM
#4

Posts: 1225
I've been playing live, and I've been around to see the vet rifle flamer meta. Structurally, a flamer does not belong on a durable squad, ever, or you create a recipe for a balance clusterfuck. Just consider the current meta where you have penal blobs with flamers dominating every urban map at will.
6 Jan 2017, 14:43 PM
#5

Posts: 2636 | Subs: 17
Thx for the replay. I'll be watching it!
You know that this is a replay about WBP 1.3, and that Flamer penals in WBP are very much different from live-version Penals, right?
I've been playing live, and I've been around to see the vet rifle flamer meta. Structurally, a flamer does not belong on a durable squad, ever, or you create a recipe for a balance clusterfuck. Just consider the current meta where you have penal blobs with flamers dominating every urban map at will.
You know that this is a replay about WBP 1.3, and that Flamer penals in WBP are very much different from live-version Penals, right?
6 Jan 2017, 15:02 PM
#6

Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
Also here you can see M42 bug I have been talking here about
https://www.coh2.org/topic/58410/m42-light-at-gun-bug
I think penals and urban defence may be really good choice on urban maps.
If I didn´t extend so much with penals and didn´t lose soo many of them, I think I would have won
(still need to learn how squishy, yet strong they are)
https://www.coh2.org/topic/58410/m42-light-at-gun-bug
I think penals and urban defence may be really good choice on urban maps.
If I didn´t extend so much with penals and didn´t lose soo many of them, I think I would have won
(still need to learn how squishy, yet strong they are)
6 Jan 2017, 17:20 PM
#7


Posts: 612 | Subs: 1
Yeah i think if you played that a bit better you could have won. There is no way I should have been able to hold the builds/center at all. If you had flanked a little bit and held the buildings i would have been cut off all the time. Also this with a call in HMG would have works insanely well.
PAGES (1)

1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
77 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
43 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
17 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.60984.879+4
- 2.10935.757+4
- 3.43264.871+1
- 4.302169.641+1
- 5.14851.744-1
- 6.14765.693+15
- 7.14939.793+8
- 8.401200.667+10
- 9.19565.750+8
- 10.199105.655+2
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★
-
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel
-
Heartless Jäger

Einhoven Country

Honor it
14

Download
1388
Board Info
340 users are online:
340 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
35 posts in the last month
8 posts in the last week
35 posts in the last month
Registered members: 54527
Welcome our newest member, Chiricos
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Chiricos
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM