Panzerwerfer wiping Skabinsk's infantry 1-by-1. Seriously tho tactical support is a must for any competitive Allied team in team games. Skabinsk was floating munitions and not spamming it enough. A well-coordinated push with Ez8 swarm, T34-85 swarm, Comet swarm while infantry are fuking back off to base and all tanks are engine critted would have been more effective.
Pershing heavy tank and IS2 vs. heavy tank destroyers will usually end in Axis favour. Mud is very high resources map so needed strength in numbers. Comet would have been better with more HP, armour, and faster reload than the awfully slow FF since fuel is never a problem on Mud.
P47 may not work as well vs. SoE who seem to know what they're doing; a single flak HT at the back would have put an end to that. I've had a single flak HT behind the lines counter 2x overlapping p47 strikes very easily. Hence again arty cover + move up all the sh1t would have been the best bet.
there will, and even 3 is no match vs a non vet single okw flakHT. (the free flak shoot down notting...)
we played vs rank #1 2 games yesterday 2x brits and 1 usf, all 3 went p47 commander. no match no prolbme. nonvet flak.
to the Nebelwerfer discussing, nebel on its own special for the cost is not well
no other units kills so fast so many(but your fault if you blob so much) units like this.
But if you compare the overall balanced allied is still ahead way ahead.
without Nebel you have no chance to kill the british inf or browning usf blobs....
even 2x vet 2 panzerfüsilis with officer waiting
in green cover vs the 3 Section with bren, no cover running into the positon of the füsis ...
PFs killing just 2 models and get totaly rekt with 10 model looses.... fakking useless shit.
check the replay on the right fuel.
if you complayne about Nebelwerfer, yes you are right this unit is not well balanced.
But it is the same if you loose 60 doller and you are complanine about the 10 doller and not about the 50 ....
soory for my awesome english