Login

russian armor

Operation Charlie Fox Rules Update

19 Sep 2015, 13:29 PM
#2
avatar of BeltFedWombat
Patrion 14

Posts: 951

Best solution to a crappy problem, IMO.
19 Sep 2015, 14:06 PM
#3
avatar of BlackKorp

Posts: 974 | Subs: 2

Relic ruined the Turney, thx gg relic, im really pissed off. Sorry but that i have to admit :(
19 Sep 2015, 16:18 PM
#4
avatar of computerheat
Honorary Member Badge
Benefactor 117

Posts: 2838 | Subs: 3

Relic ruined the Turney, thx gg relic, im really pissed off. Sorry but that i have to admit :(

Jeez it's not that dire. It's a 4-day tourney and this is only for day 1. Next week's hotfix should solve most of the problems listed here. The tourney will still produce many, many great games, and we might actually see something other than Rifle Company for USF!
19 Sep 2015, 16:47 PM
#5
avatar of korea_park
Donator 11

Posts: 197 | Subs: 1

relic ruined the tourney... :O

19 Sep 2015, 18:57 PM
#6
avatar of skyshark

Posts: 239

why the ban of elite troops?
19 Sep 2015, 20:49 PM
#7
avatar of MajorBloodnok
Admin Red  Badge
Patrion 314

Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9

Elite Troops were perceived as P2W apparently. i.e. gaining the vet advantages without working for it. As the long term goal of the forum is to try to achieve e-sports status, which is another subject altogether, it was felt that Elite Troops undermines that ethos.

As there has been a certain amount of disquiet about the exclusions, it may be helpful if I also mention, that the staff thread runs to 6 pages and involves over 40 Staff members contributing to it. The decision was taken on a vote.

This project has involved terrific support from the community and we hope that the interest in it will be widespread. We are most anxious that the game is displayed in its best light

We also know that some people will be disappointed by the decision - that is only natural, since the staff vote itself was not 100% one-sided. To those who are frustrated, i can only apologise. The decision was taken for the greater good and we are as anxious as you are, for the tourney to succeed and to showcase the game. We are conscious that if things went wrong, the blame will lie on our shoulders.

We started the process on the basis of all commanders included and no bulletins. I am afraid that the recent patch problems are what started the discussion, and things spread from there.
19 Sep 2015, 21:13 PM
#8
19 Sep 2015, 21:14 PM
#9
avatar of Symbiosis

Posts: 862

The only useful US commander always gets banned -.-
19 Sep 2015, 22:18 PM
#10
avatar of Gbpirate
Senior Editor Badge

Posts: 1150

Brits should be verboten altogether.
Their only infantry-based suppression platform is eliminated. Sad day for OCF.
20 Sep 2015, 02:55 AM
#11
avatar of CyberGuru

Posts: 20

I'm sure this was probably discussed and voted against - but I think the tourney should have been postponed until the hotfix.
20 Sep 2015, 04:37 AM
#12
avatar of BartonPL

Posts: 2807 | Subs: 6

why the ban of elite troops?


because i've never seen Hans using other doctrine that Tiger Ice :hansGASM:
20 Sep 2015, 08:31 AM
#13
avatar of mandrus123

Posts: 2

Ktoś mi to po polsku przetłumaczy?
20 Sep 2015, 09:03 AM
#14
avatar of Spanky
Senior Strategist Badge

Posts: 1820 | Subs: 2

The only useful US commander always gets banned -.-


This..
20 Sep 2015, 11:30 AM
#15
avatar of BeltFedWombat
Patrion 14

Posts: 951

As there has been a certain amount of disquiet about the exclusions, it may be helpful if I also mention, that the staff thread runs to 6 pages and involves over 40 Staff members contributing to it. The decision was taken on a vote.

This project has involved terrific support from the community and we hope that the interest in it will be widespread. We are most anxious that the game is displayed in its best light

We also know that some people will be disappointed by the decision - that is only natural, since the staff vote itself was not 100% one-sided. To those who are frustrated, i can only apologise. The decision was taken for the greater good and we are as anxious as you are, for the tourney to succeed and to showcase the game. We are conscious that if things went wrong, the blame will lie on our shoulders.

We started the process on the basis of all commanders included and no bulletins. I am afraid that the recent patch problems are what started the discussion, and things spread from there.


An intelligent and reasoned post which I support one hundred per cent. Sadly, this is the internet, where intelligence and reason are doomed.
20 Sep 2015, 16:39 PM
#16
avatar of ThatRabidPotato

Posts: 218

Only Useful US commander? Someone has never heard of Armor, or Infantry, or Airborne...
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

370 users are online: 2 members and 368 guests
Crecer13, Esxile
3 posts in the last 24h
41 posts in the last week
141 posts in the last month
Registered members: 44900
Welcome our newest member, NCrealtor
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM