Login

russian armor

What do you think about USF?

What do you think about USF, please explain why!
Option Distribution Votes
16%
48%
20%
4%
12%
Total votes: 25
Vote VOTE! Vote ABSTAIN
19 Apr 2015, 22:12 PM
#1
avatar of Leodot

Posts: 254

I am interested in your opinion of USF.
19 Apr 2015, 22:23 PM
#2
avatar of tiburon680

Posts: 130

Medium army, no heavy tanks
19 Apr 2015, 22:28 PM
#3
avatar of chipwreckt

Posts: 732

Cant get clear results from this pol. Since it is heavily dependend on map (and side!) and/ or gamemode. And wtf is a "medium" army? Like preparing a steak? I would like my army medium strong? like wtf :hyper:
19 Apr 2015, 22:32 PM
#4
avatar of MajorBloodnok
Admin Red  Badge
Patrion 314

Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9

Thread title fixed
19 Apr 2015, 23:25 PM
#5
avatar of DonnieChan

Posts: 2257 | Subs: 1

me and my friend are playing double USF lately and it's the most fun ive ever had. the thing is that you have to use all your forces all the time together and thus achieving a great synergy. thats hard to achieve but very rewarding. and their Units are all so much fun. Very happy about the design decision against heavy tanks!
20 Apr 2015, 10:31 AM
#6
avatar of flatline115

Posts: 98

Medium Army (the worst faction goes to okw). I like riflemen (C'mon rng god give rifle company!) and the AA half track. The sherman is a great Anti-Infantry killer but.. They have no heavy tanks and while the jackson is cool at the end of the day it is a tank destroyer and not as versatile as enemy tanks ie Panzer 4 or Tiger. If it had the pershing or some commander with a heavy tank it'd be one of the best.
21 Apr 2015, 01:12 AM
#7
avatar of Kurobane

Posts: 658

My biggest issue with USF is that you are locked into Rifle Spam for the first part of the game without any other alternative. As a RTS, having more diverse build options is a good thing something that USF is in dire need of.
21 Apr 2015, 15:38 PM
#8
avatar of Leodot

Posts: 254

Thank you guys, I realy apreciate your votes. I am getting usefull thoughts about a faction I struggle with.

The most issue for me is that most of the player I see are going riflemen and then sherman.

Sometimes M8...or scout car, but rarly.

I think the most common BO is:

3 x riflemen
1 x captain or Leutanent
1 x Major
? x sherman / Jackson

+ paras or other
23 Apr 2015, 16:58 PM
#9
avatar of Sinister

Posts: 96 | Subs: 1

u forgot to add m20
24 Apr 2015, 15:44 PM
#10
avatar of samich

Posts: 205

Most common builds are:

3 rifles - lt - m20 - major - sherman
4 rifles - cap - at gun - major - sherman

or the patented:

pick rifles:

6 riflemen - lt - major - sherman
24 Apr 2015, 15:57 PM
#11
avatar of Budwise
Admin Red  Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 2075 | Subs: 2

They are my least favorite of the 4.
26 Apr 2015, 01:57 AM
#12
avatar of pigsoup
Patrion 14

Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2

my favourite and i love playing them. love using all of their commanders and all of their non doc units as well.

but they lack depth like coh2 itself and with WFA armies especially. why i think relic should just work on existing armies instead of releasing same armies over and over again.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

371 users are online: 4 members and 367 guests
Farlon, nigo, aerafield, shinasukac
17 posts in the last 24h
45 posts in the last week
99 posts in the last month
Registered members: 44646
Welcome our newest member, oneandonlycarrentald
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM