I used to use them all of the time with Lightning War but I shied away from them because I felt I could get roughly the same performance from the LMG. Plus the way I play my grens were stationary a lot so I didn't need their damage on the move perk.
Now I almost exclusively use Spearhead or Mech Assault for serious play. I am wondering if the LMG nerfs means the G43s are more viable now? Enough for me to go back to Lightning War maybe.
How do you all feel about G43s?
How do you feel about G43s?
12 Nov 2014, 19:10 PM
#1
Posts: 156
12 Nov 2014, 20:00 PM
#2
Posts: 324 | Subs: 2
Before they made the G43 mid-range and basically switched roles with the LMG42 i was in love with it - and the Lightning War doctrine. It suited my defensive, long range infantry heavy T2 strategy very well. Plus: They were one of the best counters against snipers. In combination with a Tiger, G43s were incredibly efficient.
Nowadays i feel it lacks incentive to go G43s, even with the LMG nerfs. I rather pay more munitions for more long ranged DPS, even if it is stationary, simple as that. The interrogation ability can be handy though, IF you can remember to use it. (I did in maybe 1 out of 30 games to be honest.)
For instance if you were forced to play on Stalingrad (you should never NOT veto this map as Ostheer), and you can't spend much munitions on upgrades, it would make sense to chose G43s. Otherwise... rather not.
Nowadays i feel it lacks incentive to go G43s, even with the LMG nerfs. I rather pay more munitions for more long ranged DPS, even if it is stationary, simple as that. The interrogation ability can be handy though, IF you can remember to use it. (I did in maybe 1 out of 30 games to be honest.)
For instance if you were forced to play on Stalingrad (you should never NOT veto this map as Ostheer), and you can't spend much munitions on upgrades, it would make sense to chose G43s. Otherwise... rather not.
http://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561198041705871
"Axis can STALL2WIN to get to that late game, there is really no hope for USF competitively short of getting the best side of the best USF maps and being an order of magnitude better than your opponent." - SageOfTheSix, after losing to Jesulin's Ostheer on Semoskiy Winter
"Axis can STALL2WIN to get to that late game, there is really no hope for USF competitively short of getting the best side of the best USF maps and being an order of magnitude better than your opponent." - SageOfTheSix, after losing to Jesulin's Ostheer on Semoskiy Winter
12 Nov 2014, 20:08 PM
#3
Posts: 131
I feel like people keep debating this. Even with the nerf I see no way G43s are better than LMGs.
I dont think your meant to chase and move around with Grens. Like it or not Wer is a more Stationary faction. Most very mobile and close range units (pgrens, 222 scout car, Ostwind etc..) are quite low on armor and/or health, they serve as ambushers ( I love ambush upgrade tho).
So in the end, if grens had the durability of say Riflemen or the movement bonus of Conscripts with Hoorah....then yes...Id go G43s. As of now...Id rather invite the allies into my LMG, HMG, Mortar meatgrinder.
I dont think your meant to chase and move around with Grens. Like it or not Wer is a more Stationary faction. Most very mobile and close range units (pgrens, 222 scout car, Ostwind etc..) are quite low on armor and/or health, they serve as ambushers ( I love ambush upgrade tho).
So in the end, if grens had the durability of say Riflemen or the movement bonus of Conscripts with Hoorah....then yes...Id go G43s. As of now...Id rather invite the allies into my LMG, HMG, Mortar meatgrinder.
 | Playercard of darkerdayzud | |||||||||||||||||||
|
12 Nov 2014, 21:41 PM
#4
Posts: 658
yeah g43 good for chasing,but for me lmg still useful gun
12 Nov 2014, 21:45 PM
#5
Posts: 1702
Well, G43 increases your long, mid, and close range firepower.
We can compare it to PPSH conscripts, which only increases your close range and drastically decreases your mid and long range firepower.
G43 grens beat even PPSH conscripts at long range, so G43 is pretty much a no brainer upgrade, considering that even LMG grens lose to PPSH conscripts at close range, while G43 grens beat ppsh conscripts and normal conscripts at absolutely all situations.
We can compare it to PPSH conscripts, which only increases your close range and drastically decreases your mid and long range firepower.
G43 grens beat even PPSH conscripts at long range, so G43 is pretty much a no brainer upgrade, considering that even LMG grens lose to PPSH conscripts at close range, while G43 grens beat ppsh conscripts and normal conscripts at absolutely all situations.
12 Nov 2014, 22:05 PM
#6
Posts: 412
If you can remember interrogate and it does not bug out (anyone else get that? 
), then they are very worth it. LMG's require less micro though and overall are better for 15 munitions if your not getting usage out of interrogate imo.
), then they are very worth it. LMG's require less micro though and overall are better for 15 munitions if your not getting usage out of interrogate imo.
12 Nov 2014, 23:39 PM
#7
Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2
I like G43s because they suit my preference for fluid infantry play.
But they, and the doctrines they are in, don't mesh well with OKW and as I only play large games I am not using them much these days.
But they, and the doctrines they are in, don't mesh well with OKW and as I only play large games I am not using them much these days.
Resident Soviet Whiner and Grand Master Bias Jedi; General Secretary of the Soviet Whine Hydra Collective; Axis Hating Sheeple; Allied Butt Buddy! Collect Them All!
Also the African Branch of TAB Bulletins
PS: The Italian Army fought with courage and skill
Also the African Branch of TAB Bulletins
PS: The Italian Army fought with courage and skill
13 Nov 2014, 04:29 AM
#8
Posts: 503
I used to use them all of the time with Lightning War but I shied away from them because I felt I could get roughly the same performance from the LMG. Plus the way I play my grens were stationary a lot so I didn't need their damage on the move perk.
Now I almost exclusively use Spearhead or Mech Assault for serious play. I am wondering if the LMG nerfs means the G43s are more viable now? Enough for me to go back to Lightning War maybe.
How do you all feel about G43s?
I do love them but you have to give up LMG goodness then...however because munitions are so needed by Wehr I use them on match ups where I am getting lots of Grens since I won't have the munitions to equip them all with LMGs...wish they were 10 munis cheaper though.
13 Nov 2014, 05:20 AM
#9
Posts: 144
OK G43 is good enough. But still LMG is better.
17 Nov 2014, 15:47 PM
#10
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
I prefer using G43s against Americans, and Soviets if they bring heavy mortars. This way you can always move your squads and you do not lose firepower. Against infantry blobs, LMG is the answer.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
86 | ||
 |
|
|
77 | ||
 |
|
|
54 | ||
|
|
|
|
29 | ||
|
|
|
|
16 | ||
|
|
|
|
676 | ||
|
|
|
|
63 | ||
|
|
|
|
33 | ||
 |
|
|
15 | ||
 |
|
|
12 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.968562.633+23
- 2.555227.710+11
- 3.29446.865-1
- 4.275110.714+13
- 5.259143.644+3
- 6.250150.625+11
- 7.22491.711+11
- 8.19265.747+5
- 9.670423.613+6
- 10.5611.836+3
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
7
Download
742
Board Info
505 users are online:
505 guests
0 post in the last 24h
20 posts in the last week
133 posts in the last month
20 posts in the last week
133 posts in the last month
Registered members: 45006
Welcome our newest member, Bean
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Bean
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM