M26 Pershing
- This thread is locked
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently BannedWhat balance issues exists without it? Or will occur if added?
Discuss......
Posts: 1970 | Subs: 5
Posts: 17884 | Subs: 8
Posts: 438
Posts: 760
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently BannedPosts: 222
Posts: 183
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently BannedWhats the Arguments against Pershing? I think they are all pure German Fanboys and angry to lose
Well said!
Posts: 467
Posts: 1108
Posts: 1702
Posts: 656
This thread...
+1
Hasn't this been discussed enough?
Posts: 978
Okay, I´m off to open another buff Panther thread. Cya there!
Posts: 1439
Posts: 4928
Whats the Arguments against Pershing?
Design: The Pershing wasn't used in the Ardennes where the USF design is based around.
Balance: Vehicle Crews and the Jackson, these were designed to make USF formidable without needing a Heavy Tank. Add a Heavy Tank, and you'll need to disable these.
Posts: 467
Posts: 43
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently BannedOnce again, adding a USF heavy tank goes against faction design(which the developers worked/planned) and really isn't needed. United States Army is meant to be flexible and durable, without "elite" units. It's fine as is.
OKW isnt meant to have mediums tanks. Yet a commander lets them field 2 p4's. spare me with the "against faction design" argument.
Posts: 467
Once again, adding a USF heavy tank goes against faction design(which the developers worked/planned) and really isn't needed. United States Army is meant to be flexible and durable, without "elite" units. It's fine as is.]
anything with m1919 is elite. and paras with thompsons too
Livestreams
51 | |||||
47 | |||||
34 | |||||
32 | |||||
20 | |||||
19 | |||||
16 | |||||
3 | |||||
42 | |||||
11 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.968562.633+23
- 2.555227.710+11
- 3.29144.869+1
- 4.275110.714+13
- 5.259143.644+3
- 6.249150.624+10
- 7.19265.747+5
- 8.14138.788+16
- 9.18878.707+2
- 10.669423.613+5
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger