Login

russian armor

Penal Battalions historicaly and what confusses most people

14 Apr 2014, 13:27 PM
#1
avatar of BabaRoga

Posts: 829

Sentence for Penal battalion:

3 months in Penal Battalion, not a day more.

Any man that dies in battle has washed the stain from his record with his blood and is given full military funeral and military honors

Any man that is wounded in battle has proven his loyalty to Soviet Union and is automatically discharged from Penal Battalion with record wiped clear and military honors.

Any man that does or is part of heroic action in battle is deemed to have proven his loyalty to Soviet Union and is released from Penal Battalion with record wiped clean and honors. On recommendation of NKVD officer.

Any man that serves 3 months in Penal Battalion is released to General army with his service in Penal battalions remaining on his record.

Surviving 3 months in Penal battalion was the worst outcome as soldier and his family would be tarnished as non-patriotic and subject to being sent to Sibir or scrutinized.

These troops were highly motivated, many of them received highest Soviet medals and many died or were wounded in heroic actions.

Thats why they were given best weapons, and most important objectives during battles.

Would you like to face vs battalion of these man or farmboys, accountants and factory workers with 2 week crash course military training?

Many people confuse Penal Battalions with deserters who were shot on spot or sent to clear mine fields as punishment

Your text.. Watch around minute 8, if you aren't that interested


Neo
14 Apr 2014, 13:42 PM
#2
avatar of Neo

Posts: 471


Thats why they were given best weapons...


Yes, no doubt the Soviet Union gave troops who it wanted to punish brand new weapons to play with.

I'll have a double of whatever you're smoking.
14 Apr 2014, 13:45 PM
#3
avatar of BabaRoga

Posts: 829

jump backJump back to quoted post14 Apr 2014, 13:42 PMNeo


Yes, no doubt the Soviet Union gave troops who it wanted to punish brand new weapons to play with.

I'll have a double of whatever you're smoking.


Who do you think I'll believe, History channel, British museum of History or some guy from internet opinion about something he knows absolutely nothing about?
14 Apr 2014, 13:46 PM
#4
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17875 | Subs: 8

Exactly.

Vast majority of people, for whatever reason(lack of education on the subject DUUH) think penal troops were conscripts, but without any training, which is wrong.

Penal troops had absolutely nothing to loose and could gain something if they succeeded, they were determined to complete the task at hand, they weren't used for MG42 target practice(thou they did cleared minefields) and were often experienced soldiers and officers.

Game description wording make it sound like they were taken out of prisons, given rifles and pointed to the battlefield. Nothing more misleading.

Penal battalions were expendable, but they were also battle hardened in most cases.
14 Apr 2014, 13:50 PM
#5
avatar of WiFiDi
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 3293

the history channel is load of shit. they jumped off a ship a long time ago. not to say there wrong on this but in reality it doesn't matter what there called it is a unit and it's balanced like any other unit, to fill a certain role. (its a game) Guards would be interesting non doctrinal unit. but there not and its probably far to late the change so im sure they make due. :)
Neo
14 Apr 2014, 13:52 PM
#6
avatar of Neo

Posts: 471

jump backJump back to quoted post14 Apr 2014, 13:46 PMKatitof
Exactly.

Vast majority of people, for whatever reason(lack of education on the subject DUUH) think penal troops were conscripts, but without any training, which is wrong.

Penal troops had absolutely nothing to loose and could gain something if they succeeded, they were determined to complete the task at hand, they weren't used for MG42 target practice(thou they did cleared minefields) and were often experienced soldiers and officers.

Game description wording make it sound like they were taken out of prisons, given rifles and pointed to the battlefield. Nothing more misleading.

Penal battalions were expendable, but they were also battle hardened in most cases.


I agree that they were highly motivated but the notion that they were given the best weapons and even armor is ridiculous. Casualties in penal battalions were 3-6 times higher than in regular units, why would you give the best weapons to soldiers who had a life expectancy of 1-2 months at most?
14 Apr 2014, 14:14 PM
#7
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17875 | Subs: 8

Well, they were given equipment that would allow them to complete the task effectively. It didn't matter if they survived, but as I've said, they had equipment to get the job done.

It was some assault and bunker busting? They got decent rifles and explosives.
It was running over mine fields? They got enough vodka to do it willingly.
14 Apr 2014, 14:20 PM
#8
avatar of Shell_yeah

Posts: 258

Casualties were so high because they were given the hardest tasks. They were leading attacks and covering retreats. That means they needed the best possible equipment to be able to complete their tasks.

14 Apr 2014, 14:46 PM
#9
avatar of AvNY

Posts: 862

jump backJump back to quoted post14 Apr 2014, 13:52 PMNeo


I agree that they were highly motivated but the notion that they were given the best weapons and even armor is ridiculous. Casualties in penal battalions were 3-6 times higher than in regular units, why would you give the best weapons to soldiers who had a life expectancy of 1-2 months at most?


There is a fail in your logic. It depends what their tasks were. Casualty rates might have no correlation to the kind of equipment a unit receives though it is most likely they are positively correlated (the units who are exposed to combat, particularly high risk combat, receive good equipment). There are very many examples of this:

- U-boats were constantly being updated redesigned. Yet there is no single service in WWII that suffered a greater attrition rate (90%).

- US bomber never expected to finish their 25 mission tour of duty despite flying the most advanced combat systems of their time.

- Casualty rates of Airborne units was expected to be 50% or greater in practically EVERY drop.

Invariably history seems to want to tarnish the commanders as being inhumane when this was rarely the case. The legends of WWI were that the officers dined while the troops died. In fact the officers tried many different tactics, many different technologies, and much training to break the deadlocks. The British officer corps suffered greater casualties than the troops did.

The most inhumane acts inflicted on troops was sending poorly trained troops to the lines. Both sides were guilty. The US sent non-armor trained troops to fight in Shermans (which is the real reason for high Sherman losses, not the equipment) and filled ranks depleted by casualties while units were on the front instead of replacing frontline units to re-train and integrate replacements. The Nazis sent up pilots with only 10 hours of flight time to man high performance fighters.
14 Apr 2014, 14:52 PM
#10
avatar of voltardark

Posts: 967

Penal battalion would be fine if they would add at-grenade to them if the upgrade is bought in HQ.

They would still be different than conscripts. (They still lack merge, molotov and they cost more)

My 2 cent.

Truly yours.
14 Apr 2014, 15:00 PM
#11
avatar of coh2player

Posts: 1571

The penal battalions were equipped like assault troops and given equipment suitable to the task.

Assault troops got SMGs, SVTs, flamethrowers, explosives, mine detectors, etc They were NOT sent on the battlefield to do minimal damage and then die.

There is memoir of penal battalion officer I looked at and it discloses that many were composed completely of dishonored officers and noncoms. (combat leaders). In the regular army they were ranked men and in the penal battalion they were privates.

The goal in the unit was to essentially get re-instated in the regular army and have their records clear. This was typically accomplished by succeeding in battle and winning medals.

It was not a 'suicide battalion'.
14 Apr 2014, 15:16 PM
#12
avatar of van Voort
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post14 Apr 2014, 13:42 PMNeo


Yes, no doubt the Soviet Union gave troops who it wanted to punish brand new weapons to play with.



Because no one gave The Dirty Dozen weapons at all.


Which is the pop cultural reference point people should be using

15 Apr 2014, 07:27 AM
#13
avatar of BabaRoga

Posts: 829

jump backJump back to quoted post14 Apr 2014, 13:52 PMNeo


I agree that they were highly motivated but the notion that they were given the best weapons and even armor is ridiculous. Casualties in penal battalions were 3-6 times higher than in regular units, why would you give the best weapons to soldiers who had a life expectancy of 1-2 months at most?


What if I told you that Penal unit as you imagine it is just a video game unit.

In Reality Penal battalions consisted of Penal Guards Rifle squads, Penal Engineer squads, Penal Snipers, Penal tank formations, Penal Airforce squadrons, etc.

Yes they were punished, but they were given way to redeem themselves while in the same time making Penal battalions highly motivated and huge asset for Red Army commanders.

Hence they were given the best weapons, because there were few other soldiers as highly motivated.

Their casualty rate was 80% but their ability to attack and defeat strongest defenses was unrivaled
15 Apr 2014, 14:02 PM
#14
avatar of MarcoRossolini

Posts: 1042

There's a book called "Penalty Strike" by a guy who commanded a penal company which I've been meaning to get for sometime...
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

512 users are online: 1 member and 511 guests
aerafield
19 posts in the last 24h
51 posts in the last week
105 posts in the last month
Registered members: 44659
Welcome our newest member, Yourcounselling
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM