Barton vs Giap, Balance at its finest

Upload replay

New Reply

RNGBartonPL

SturmTigerGiap

No chat in this replay.

Honor it

Show Chat

Patch: 3.0.0.13106
Duration: 01:01:49

Posts: 2807 | Subs: 6

I'm posting this because I'm disappointed of the game balance, also gg to Giap, vet 3 IS-2 and Tiger involved

Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1

And some people dare to claim the tigers have bad AI fire power.

Very nice game. GG

Posts: 826 | Subs: 2

"Those soviet at-gun are useless"

Full Rage MVGame

Giap choosed Tiger(s) This is the best way for loose vs at-guns and KV-8 in my opinion.

Anyway, ADAPT BARTON MVGame

You did the old strat of cons spam, it can't work now. Kappa

Try : Penals, M3, enginers flamer, 1 cons, T-34/85s call-in and you have the beautiful Mark vehicule ( "IS-2 Shoot" )

or : 3 cons, 2 maxims, motar ( and precision strike HA HA Kappa ) t-34/85 single call-in, and you have ppsh for your conscripts too.

In langreskaya you can make a t-4 at the end if you will.

Su-85 + t-34/85 single call-in, What else ? MVGame
Only elefant can counter this ? Kappa

Posts: 2807 | Subs: 6

cons strat is good, problem is only with those lame ZiS guns

Posts: 826 | Subs: 2

Wtf ?

4 cons is a good start ?

They suck hard vs Pios-Grens, No ?

Posts: 2807 | Subs: 6

actually, cons can beat grens or pios when they are in green cover

Posts: 475

Hard to take on multiple tigers ... vet 3 tiger as well claims to be an ACE...although I think it's weaker than the real Ace. I can't back that up but it appears to be different...80 kills last time I checked you got with it, lol.

Posts: 2807 | Subs: 6

how funny is that multiple Tigers are better then multiple IS-2's. In this game there was one situation when 2x Tiger shoot and 2x ZiS shot took 80% of my IS-2 health

Posts: 124

You forgot to mention AT nades having no effect! At least 6-7 times

Posts: 309

17 Apr 2014, 19:39 PMPenetralia13

You forgot to mention AT nades having no effect! At least 6-7 times

I really think AT nade/faust should be 100% engine damage, not catastrophic, just regular. Getting your tank close to inf is a micro error that should be allowed to get punished imo. Its just one step closer to a game that favors player skill over RNG that will win you matches.

Players who micro their tanks well and make sure to be out of faust/at nade range should be rewarded. Likewise, players who setup ambushes with infantry using true sight for incoming tanks to blow the engine should also be rewarded. I can handle taking engine damage for being careless with my tanks, but its infuriating to get so many failed AT nade/faust attempts when a player micros bad or falls into my ambush.

Posts: 2807 | Subs: 6

17 Apr 2014, 19:39 PMPenetralia13

You forgot to mention AT nades having no effect! At least 6-7 times

some weeks ago I had a game where over 20 AT nades didn't penetrated Tiger so....

Posts: 475

I also think that Relic should have the faust only dmg the engine on big tanks if you hit it from side or rear, not the front.

AT nades should be more like stickies and always do something since the range is far more dangerous.

It's much easier to get fausted than it is AT naded. Right there is already favoring the Germs...